On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 07:08:54PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 12:35:42PM +1200, David McNab wrote: > > On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 11:17, Ian Clarke wrote: > > > * Migrate to a more powerful template engine such as FreeMarker > > > (http://freemarker.sf.net/). > > > > > > I have been using FreeMarker on another project and it is indeed very > > > powerful, but it would add almost 2MB to Freenet's size. > > > > Could freemarker be gutted down to the bare essentials? > > Probably not without destroying the very flexibility that makes it so > attractive. > > > Another idea - not new - for the Windows releases, include one with a > > JVM built in as the *default*, with the option to download a JVM-free > > version for people who already have an adequate JVM installed and > > running. Sun allows free redistribution of the JVM as long as a minimal > > fileset is preserved. Lots of apps do this. > > This is what we did before someone decided that we were violating [snip]
In fact, rereading your comment, what we had before was even better than your suggestion - the installer would detect whether the user needed a JVM and only download it if they did. Ian. -- Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Coordinator, The Freenet Project http://freenetproject.org/ Weblog http://slashdot.org/~sanity/journal _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
