On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 09:33:23AM -0700, Reskill wrote: > Hi, > > I guess this is mainly directed at Ian. The Production Network appears > to be running well on 692 and I would like to see freenetproject.org
Umm, could you please try 5028? It makes very little sense to maintain so many different networks and builds... 692 probably has some anon filter bugs, for example. > endorse this move and make it more "official" - hosting the proper software > etc for those who want to use it. The update script would, I guess, also > need to be modified so that when there is a forced upgrade, people get > the right thing (and don't end up on the Development Network). > > It probably wouldn't hurt if the Development Network moved onto a fresh > network also - you never know, more recent builds/technologies may work > far better without the oversized bundle of outdated legacy software clogging > up the network like black holes. Anyway, thats for the developers to > decide. > > The news article on the front page of freenetproject.org is also a little > misleading - no, there has not been a fork, but the network is dividing > into a usable and stable single-build network, and a development network. > > Basically, the nice simple fast 692 build running on the Production Network > will give a much better impression to new users. It allows quick insertion > and quick retrieval. In turn, I would imagine this will increase support > for the project. Then, if people want to play with the Development Network, > they can do so - knowing that the Production Network will always be > there for them. > > Cheers, > --Reskill -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
