On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 06:33:53PM +0100, Pete wrote: > Ian, the production network team (we need to name this), are currently > testing 598, and are more than likely going to go with that build due to > it have anon filter features that 692 doesn't and also allows Kaffe > users to partake in the production network.
Wrong. 598 doesn't either. The features are however present in the non-NIO branch, which is pretty old too. > > Pete > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian Clarke > Sent: 07 October 2003 18:10 > To: Discussion of development issues > Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Official status of Production Network as part > ofthe Freenet Project? > > Todd Walton wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Ian Clarke wrote: > >>Ok, I only suggested 692 because they did. Obviously we should choose > > >>the best option available to us. > > So make the call. 692 or 5028? Decide. > > Well, 5028 is the obvious choice simply because it is more recent. > > Ian. > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
