On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 10:09:45AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > Todd Walton wrote: > >On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Ian Clarke wrote: > >>Ok, I only suggested 692 because they did. Obviously we should choose > >>the best option available to us. > >So make the call. 692 or 5028? Decide. > > Well, 5028 is the obvious choice simply because it is more recent.
We did just try 5028 with a few people. Performance is total crap compared to 692. If it doesnt work with a few people, it will certainly not work with more. Issues: 100% load, failing inserts, inserts in fproxy not generating a CHK, and nodes dont seem to be able to communicate very well, they could better on 692. mids -- PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF19326A9 Key fingerprint = 730D 9B3A F406 F28A 957D 6397 31E8 6D4C F193 26A9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
