On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 20:47, Pete wrote: > This attitude is the sort of tabloid rubbish that landed the whole issue > on /. The code that is being run on the network is pure freenet source, > no hacks, no modifications other than to keep it from interfering with > the main network, so they are running freenet, an old build but freenet > nether the less. To illustrate a point isn't freenet china still running > network based on 0.4? Just a clarification, although the prodnet/fidnet is still using the 692 that was patched for the anonyminity bug (Thanks toad, you really helped us out a lot.) I will be soon working on trying to fix some of the bugs I have seen in it without relying on additional freenet source unless absolutely necessary. Just wanted to clear this up. Yeah, it's going to be a fork.
Tim McGrath (Hikaru on IIP) _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
