On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 11:08, Todd Walton wrote: > On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, Tim McGrath wrote: > > > Just a clarification, although the prodnet/fidnet is still using the 692 > > that was patched for the anonyminity bug (Thanks toad, you really helped > > us out a lot.) I will be soon working on trying to fix some of the bugs > > I have seen in it without relying on additional freenet source unless > > absolutely necessary. Just wanted to clear this up. Yeah, it's going to > > be a fork. > > If you're going to take responsibility for a fork, please also take > responsibility for ensuring the forked code doesn't bring down the > network as a whole. > > Unless, of course, your forked build doesn't participate in the Freenet > anyway. Prodnet is purposely not connected to the mainline network. And my changes, which will be few, will be released over weeks of time to make sure they are nondestructive to the prodnet network. There is no sacred cow - if my changes screw things up, I'll create a new version of the node with the previous version's code, and immediately release it. There is a small enough prodnet community right now that if I do mess things up, it'll become quickly obvious.
Tim McGrath (Hikaru) _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
