Todd Walton wrote: > On Sun, 12 Oct 2003, Benjamin Coates wrote: > > > A discussion on #freenet leads me to suggesting this change to QueryReject > > behavior: > > > > The goal here is to reduce the message traffic to overloaded nodes without > > seriously changing network behavior. > > What advantage does this have over the way it already happens, i.e. > NGRouting. With NGRouting, if a node is overloaded and QRs, everybody > adjusts their appraisal of the node downwards, and message traffic to that > overloaded node is reduced. > > What advantage does your above idea offer over the NGRouting effect?
Two things. One, it gives a method to know when a node is overloaded and when it clears the condition. The second, is evidence from my own node that it's not working. I'm running 6235. I have requesting nothing from freenet other than the alinks on the frontpage. inbound: 1645 nodes, 593481 attempts, 100151 accepted (16.88%), 852 successes (.85%) outbound: 107 nodes, 986111 attempts My node is accepting 16.9% of all queries, and then sending out 10 times as many queries to find the data. I'm obviously causing quite a bit of traffic on other nodes. > (Not that there are no advantages, just asking what they are.) > > -todd -Mathew _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
