On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 09:11:04PM -0400, Mathew Ryden wrote: > > Todd Walton wrote: > > On Sun, 12 Oct 2003, Benjamin Coates wrote: > > > > > A discussion on #freenet leads me to suggesting this change to > QueryReject > > > behavior: > > > > > > The goal here is to reduce the message traffic to overloaded nodes > without > > > seriously changing network behavior. > > > > What advantage does this have over the way it already happens, i.e. > > NGRouting. With NGRouting, if a node is overloaded and QRs, everybody > > adjusts their appraisal of the node downwards, and message traffic to that > > overloaded node is reduced. > > > > What advantage does your above idea offer over the NGRouting effect? > > Two things. One, it gives a method to know when a node is overloaded and > when it clears the condition. The second, is evidence from my own node that > it's not working. I'm running 6235. I have requesting nothing from freenet > other than the alinks on the frontpage. > > inbound: 1645 nodes, 593481 attempts, 100151 accepted (16.88%), 852 > successes (.85%) > outbound: 107 nodes, 986111 attempts > > My node is accepting 16.9% of all queries, and then sending out 10 times as > many queries to find the data. I'm obviously causing quite a bit of traffic > on other nodes.
Did I say that the current network was a perfect implementation of NGRouting? Most nodes are running 5028 still, and there are probably bugs in NGRouting even. Nonetheless, NGRouting can and should be allowed to decide whether to not route to a node. > > > (Not that there are no advantages, just asking what they are.) > > > > -todd > > -Mathew -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
