On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 05:18, Some Guy wrote: > > On Sunday 19 October 2003 12:42 pm, Frank v Waveren wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 02:43:28PM -0400, Ken Corson wrote:
> > > [...] Of course, trying to estimate the size of Freenet is next > > > to impossible, but I'll take a stab :) Any other gamblers out > > > there ? > > Finally the number of downloads for any given VERSION of > > freenet is higher than this. Even though not all those people > > are running permanent nodes there are surely at least that > > many users. > That is a cool thing to count. One problem may be that people have > scripted the update function to repeatedly and are causing extra > downloads. Does update.sh check to make sure it needs to update? No, it doesn't. I have a version which uses wget datestamping (and had to work around a bug in wget: you can't use both -O and --datestamping). The problem is, the date stamps on the server keep changing even when the content is identical. The server script ought to compare the files and replace with the newer one only if they are different. And of course, how about the windows version? -- Ed Huff _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
