It's already too late, I wiped of the node with it's 40gig datastore from the harddrive. No way and no will to get it back.
"Buh Bai" Matthias. Just a note that I'm plugging back in after a week or two of not running a node. So I'll balance out this huge loss ;) I only have about 10k outbound (cable modem), and I wonder if reducing the number of nodes in the routing table to 10 or 15 for ALL test nodes -might- help to simulate a larger net with larger RTs. I don't think keeping 50 routes is appropriate for a mini-net with 100's of nodes. (like, average successful HTL=1.2135 ?!!? ) Also, is it worth specifying the "suggested" size of a datastore in this new, small, TEST environment ? Perhaps if everyone ran a small datastore (how small?) we could better focus on specialization to some extent. It would be pointless if everyone accumulated the entire key space locally. After all, we need to "simulate" normal data insertion in a larger net. It doesn't matter what we insert, just that we coordinate our ins and outs for the purpose of testing. If we get 100 nodes, can we have 'n' volunteers to do regular publishing - the content doesn't really matter... just that we produce a reasonable publisher:subscriber ratio expected in a larger network. And have one single launching link ? I'm willing to learn to be a publisher.
That's my $0.02
-Ken
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
