as a personal suggestion, take a long breath and try to write and act as a "primus inter pares" and not as a dictator.
Firstly, If you have a "personal suggestion", send it to me "personally", not the mailing list.
Secondly, if Matthew has to get a consensus before every minor decision as he struggles to debug unstable - we will never get anywhere. The bottom line is that those using unstable are on the cutting edge by their own choice, and therefore have no real right to complain if they get cut every now and then because they don't pay attention to the mailing lists.
If you want to help us develop Freenet, then run unstable and report bugs - but please don't expect it to work all the time, it is called "unstable" for a reason.
A single message in the mailing lists .... that's all that was omitted, but it is the sign of a big relatioship problem.
What exactly do you call this?: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.devel/6634
The fact that you and others try to justify this is another sign.
The fact that people are still talking about this is a sign that some users think they have a God given right to a working Freenet without accepting that Freenet development is fucking complicated, and Freenet developers are either grossly underpaid, or not paid at all.
I'll stop my node/gateway and other Freenet related activities till one of the following facts will happen
Volunteers don't respond well to ultimatums from those that do little else but whine when things aren't going well.
Ian.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
