* Colin Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-18 02:27:29]: > I'm considering starting a project to create a new library, but > wanted to make sure no one else was doing it first. > > Currently, there exist a number of options that exist via TMCI, but > not via FCP. Examples include getting a list of connected nodes, > adding peers, etc.. > > I'm interesting in creating a new library which emulated these > functions in Java, by connecting to the TMCI server, and then > formatting them, and returning them. > > For example, I could (pseudo code follows) > > Node = new connection(127.0.0.1,2323); > Array NodeNames[] = Node.getListOfPeers(NodeName); > Array IPAddresses[] = Node.getListOfPeers(IP); > > Node.AddConnection(URL, "http://ubernode.org/ref/ref.txt";); > Node.DeleteConnection(NodeName, "sanity-darknet"); > > > > etc... > > > Is anyone working on this presently? Is there any reason I shouldn't? >
It should be done in FCP, we all agree on that, including toad. The thing is we don't want to ease the development of references auto-adder so the priority of the task 'implementing the FCP feature of exposing the peer list through FCP' is low. Exposing the configuration framework through FCP is also planned ... If you want us^toad to raise the priority of that task, find good arguments, keeping in mind that anything with 'auto-adder' in the name won't please developpers. Developping YetAnotherLayer/Library isn't a good idea imho NextGen$
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
