On Jun 18, 2006, at 5:34 AM, Dave Baker wrote:
I believe I probably speak for most of the Freenet hacker community
when I say
that I just think the devlopment effort that you're putting in to
this would
be so much better spent on having the functionality available over
FCP,
rather than building a, as you say yourself, slightly hackish
library over
the TMCI.
I agree, but the problem is I'm not a very good programmer ;)
I can get by, but just barely. I can manage to make an interface to
Telnet, since it's a defined interface. Last time I tried to edit
something in the node code, I got lost, and ended up changing
something entirely unrelated ;)
All I'm trying to do is to add a noderef to my OWN node.. I would
hope that that wouldn't be so tough ;)
Totally. I'm also of the opinion that this should be part of the
FCP, but
there is debate on this, so if you do decide to implement this in
FCP, I'd
have a chat with Toad first.
I accept that there is a debate about this. It's not my fight... I
understand whichever way they want to do it.
The thing is, since it's available via fproxy ANYWAY, it's available
via Telnet ANYWAY, not putting it via FCP just encourages hacks like
mine ;)
-Colin
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
