On 6/18/06, Colin Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 18, 2006, at 5:34 AM, Dave Baker wrote: > I believe I probably speak for most of the Freenet hacker community > when I say > that I just think the devlopment effort that you're putting in to > this would > be so much better spent on having the functionality available over > FCP, > rather than building a, as you say yourself, slightly hackish > library over > the TMCI. I agree, but the problem is I'm not a very good programmer ;) I can get by, but just barely. I can manage to make an interface to Telnet, since it's a defined interface. Last time I tried to edit something in the node code, I got lost, and ended up changing something entirely unrelated ;) > >> All I'm trying to do is to add a noderef to my OWN node.. I would >> hope that that wouldn't be so tough ;) > > Totally. I'm also of the opinion that this should be part of the > FCP, but > there is debate on this, so if you do decide to implement this in > FCP, I'd > have a chat with Toad first. > I accept that there is a debate about this. It's not my fight... I understand whichever way they want to do it. The thing is, since it's available via fproxy ANYWAY, it's available via Telnet ANYWAY, not putting it via FCP just encourages hacks like mine ;)
And having it will encourage hackish solutions to people not wanting to bother to do darknet the right way which is bad for the whole network. It's possible through fproxy but it's not easy to do so it'll continue to work. It's possible through TMCI but that's going to be removed at some point.
-Colin _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
