-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 12/08/2012 06:05 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Saturday 08 Dec 2012 03:11:28 Steve Dougherty wrote:
>> On 12/05/2012 01:55 AM, Robert Hailey wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 2012/12/04 (Dec), at 8:10 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Am Donnerstag, 1. November 2012, 21:30:35 schrieb Matthew 
>>>> Toseland:
>>>>> - More work on making darknet easy.
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, please!
>>>> 
>>>> How about automatic insert of my noderef as CHK, so I can 
>>>> just hand a friend an in-freenet-link to connect?
>>> 
>>> So you want a sort of... "open invitation"? Whoever finds the 
>>> chk can become a darknet peer... unless the operator has put a 
>>> count-limitation on it, or since disabled it manually (via an 
>>> open invitations list?).
>>> 
>>> An interesting idea, and not a bad one either, as it would be
>>> a necessary first step for the welcome-package idea anyway as 
>>> the "one_time_token.txt" is effectively a limit-1 
>>> open-invitation.
>>> 
>>> It seems like it would remove 50% of the handshake process for 
>>> those who find it "secure enough" for their purposes, but I 
>>> think Matthew said something about it not gelling well with 
>>> darknet-only nodes being "undetectable" (that they would have 
>>> to respond to an unverified request or something).
>> 
>> Would it be reasonable to have the installer packaged with a seed
>> such that the public key of the node installed with it could be
>> recognized? This seems like it'd mean knowing the private key 
>> too, but if someone runs an invitation bundle from someone else, 
>> they probably trust them anyway, seeing as how they're
>> connecting via darknet. Hm. Thoughts?
> 
> Including seednodes for opennet is possible but IMHO pointless, 
> since they are harvestable even if we don't distribute them 
> centrally, and since we optimise performance by using as many of 
> them as possible. Including FOAFs on the other hand is a *big* 
> gain.
> 

I'm sorry, I was unclear. I meant a PRNG seed so that the link-layer
keys would be known, so the node handing out the invite could recognize
and accept a connection from the node installed with its bundle.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=YrQG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to