Am Montag, 10. Dezember 2012, 21:15:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > Treating stuff as text causes all sorts of problems. :(
Sadly yes… > Or use FOAFs to avoid the problem entirely. And with it the uptime problem > too. Hm, yes. But having something now is better than having something maybe… > > That is something people already know. > > *Some* people already know. yes… > > > FOAF connections so you don't have to wait for me and are less > > > dependant on me being port forwarded. > > > > That is a nice idea, yes. Are these already prepared or do they need > > other changes? > > Partially implemented, but not ready yet. There is a branch. > > > In the first case, that would be an easy win. In the second I think it > > could be delayed for later improvements of the bundles. > > I don't think darknet is going to work well without FOAF connections. IMHO > it's the top priority. Could these not be added later on and benefit the ones who were invited before they were added? The power-users with always-on boxes don’t really need them yet, I think, and for those invitiations don’t depend on FOAF. But I need easy-to-use invitation bundles for my friends. My box is properly port-forwarded and always-on. But I want to avoid any hassle for my friends (so some might actually install *and run* freenet with at least one darknet connection (me)). Best wishes, Arne -- 1w6 sie zu achten, sie alle zu finden, in Spiele zu leiten und sacht zu verbinden. → http://1w6.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
