> Wow! That's impressive compatibility. Thank you. As in with the modern browser support or about the potentiality for IE6+ support?
Thanks to standards, developing for modern browsers isn't horrible, unless one visits vendor-prefix-hell. But Mozilla is now having unprefixed CSS work in Firefox and, with the recent announcement of Blink to power Chrome and Opera instead of Webkit, Chrome and Opera will too. The support in legacy / old IE is thanks to JQuery. There are some JS polyfills that I am loading in IE 8 and below so that the CSS3 I am using works there. > What I was thinking is that while the questions are about security (and other) settings, they are asked instead of an explicit selection of low / normal / high (network|physical) security levels. In the current workflow, I have it be questions that result in a certain security level being selected, based on the answer to the questions, and then the security preferences inputted in input fields underneath the selected security level. > Do these questions seem reasonable? Yes, they do to me. Thank you for explaining them. Although, as I mentioned in my reply to Paulo's email— 2, maybe 3 questions seem to be the sweet-spot from a usability standpoint. >To be clear, the way I'm thinking of this it would be a single page (and a single step - after these the first run setup is complete) with the four questions. Yes, I have it setup so this all takes place in a single page with different 'panels'. The first being the questions, the second being the selected security level and area to input settings, and the third being a confirmation that the setup is complete. +Irfan On Apr 3, 2013 10:13 PM, "Steve Dougherty" <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 04/03/2013 08:43 PM, irfan mir wrote: > > Hello all, I just wanted to update you on that I got the > > opportunity to make some major progress on the interactions of the > > new security setup. > > > > Currently all the interactions work in Chrome, Firefox, Safari, > > Opera (latest), and IE10. I plan to further develop the > > interactions so that I can extend the support deeper into the > > previous versions of the aforementioned browsers including IE6+. > > Wow! That's impressive compatibility. > > > In accordance to the user-flow discussed seen, much simplified, > > here: > > > > Ask questions-->Way questions are answered result in a security > > level being > >> selected--> security options are shown underneath selected > >> security level. > > What I was thinking is that while the questions are about security > (and other) settings, they are asked instead of an explicit selection > of low / normal / high (network|physical) security levels. > > > What is the exact wording of the questions that are to be asked in > > the first step? And how many questions are there to be? I recommend > > 3 or less. And no more than 5 if more than 3 are necessary. > > > > The wording can always be changed later, but since this is a > > high-fidelity prototype, I want the wording to be on topic and as > > close to the actual questions as possible. > > Working from the exchange between Matthew and I March 23rd: > > 1) Do you know someone who runs Freenet? > > If yes is selected: > 1.5) Do you want to connect to untrusted strangers to improve > performance? Freenet will be faster but less secure. > > If not: > Freenet will connect to strangers. You can always add connections to > your trusted friends later to improve security. > > > 2) Do you have a monthly bandwidth limit? > > If yes is selected: > [ ] GB/month > > If not: > Select your Internet connection speed: > > [table of common Internet connection speeds] > [autodetected limit if available] > [ ] KiB/s download | [ ] KiB/s upload > > > 3) How much hard drive space do you want to give to Freenet? > > [ ] GiB (initially populated with the default of some fraction of > free disk space) > > > 4) (optional) Would you like to set a password? > > Password: [ ] Confirm: [ ] > > If you set a password Freenet will require it to decrypt its data each > time you start it. > > > Do these questions seem reasonable? > > Steve > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) > > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRXOG6AAoJECLJP19KqmFu+gEQAMnLKDL4AkWdMoZlhX0MFa7E > gAF83p/q2SNKzfhlB83WXeZi/Ie8ok1UZq7ZGBZrU+rwo6Ie1th5+AgXL+kc0GIb > BQM5rn2+CWciIEfQv38KpZmV+5t0nCmn/pLJPLiYYVvCQ0pBWVDJkui+Mf3vcEeY > 5xIbqGp/fQ4x7LYrlgkrAt6X7mwlfAQvzGL/lKycfP1xPEBosBo+2nMatFMg6f12 > dquT46uNsX9ljGIp4pfbYEaxafxVM1nVwEFCWJlfZbkxvRR5hYF8f4jI8gvaU6Ku > a4H2tgcwHjVGQzqYcMz4p6Ji7rpop/2HbbwHo5b5Bx2eRDOgfgFVNBLPGyFCyIYo > /uLIpiyTSLbpp+seiuYNuK79F9gbqmXPrreruw6JQn05BS7IuL7nexEYtq+AU2to > jDAcncMasDg4Wsu3Xf+RwhJ1l8lQByLxaifrvlbXsBwnbbBAe3contK+w7tBMeuW > GJC6+BWI5ofjicRyEfeijVWblQ62HiUy82Qt3SXqLKZHsB84WX000Vm6wnYChOBy > PqiWcKnLb45tpbb14DzaOySVz4oJMS3rqeV7k/mYhdTIhoy6eNQ5oT2nmxYGsD1W > lfweBN6V+xR3k6a5thiGDOs5ml2SZ7BOhYG/FeLnQBmAAuyrO6F2GmnmiJuYfQYI > iCAmip2Obnl11crmyKH/ > =UXGD > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > [email protected] > https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl >
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
