Hi all, Just as a note that may help, on the visibility I would use verbs instead of yes/no (ex. visible/hidden as I did on http://freenet.makdisse.com/apps/connectionsfriends). What is not on this draft, but should be on the final version is a help text explaining the implications of each option. Nice to see work being done on UX things. :-)
Regards, Paulo On 31 March 2014 14:56, Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_...@web.de> wrote: > Hi, > > misaakidis wants to add default values to visibility and trust for > friends, so we now have to take a decision. > > Which do you think is the most appropriate option for each one: > > trust: > > - HIGH > - NORMAL > - LOW > > visibility (keep in mind that we need this for FOAF!): > > - YES > - NAME-ONLY > - NO > > As identified at CTS4, it is *our* job to define the default value for > that, because new users have no chance of understanding the > implications of taking either choice. > > See bug #6151 for details: > https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=6151 > > Best wishes, > Arne > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl@freenetproject.org > https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
