On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Toseland <t...@amphibian.dyndns.org > wrote:
> On 31/03/14 16:54, Nicolas Hernandez wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Matthew Toseland < > t...@amphibian.dyndns.org > >> wrote: > >> On 31/03/14 14:56, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> misaakidis wants to add default values to visibility and trust for > >>> friends, so we now have to take a decision. > >>> > >>> Which do you think is the most appropriate option for each one: > >>> > >>> trust: > >>> > >>> - HIGH > >>> - NORMAL > >>> - LOW > >>> > >>> visibility (keep in mind that we need this for FOAF!): > >>> > >>> - YES > >>> - NAME-ONLY > >>> - NO > >>> > >>> As identified at CTS4, it is *our* job to define the default value for > >>> that, because new users have no chance of understanding the > >>> implications of taking either choice. > >> It is? How are we supposed to know the risk tolerance / risk profile of > >> every single user? > >> > >> > > Sure not, IMHO we could choose LOW and NO by default as the worst case. > Except that that would sabotage performance and force wider usage of > opennet. In general your friends - even your coworkers, distant cousins > and vague acquaintances - are more trustworthy than your opennet peers. > Because... > > "On darknet you choose your friends. On opennet the bad guys choose you." > > We could add an alert message if someone leave default values. Nicolas > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl@freenetproject.org > https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
