Sorry about the last email, just now I realize that you meant the 'add friend wizard'. In this case yes/no makes total sense because it comes as an answer (http://freenet.makdisse.com/apps/addfriend3) Sorry about the confusion.
_mak On 31 March 2014 15:11, Paulo Makdisse <pa...@makdisse.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Just as a note that may help, on the visibility I would use verbs instead > of yes/no (ex. visible/hidden as I did on > http://freenet.makdisse.com/apps/connectionsfriends). > What is not on this draft, but should be on the final version is a help > text explaining the implications of each option. > Nice to see work being done on UX things. :-) > > Regards, > Paulo > > > On 31 March 2014 14:56, Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_...@web.de> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> misaakidis wants to add default values to visibility and trust for >> friends, so we now have to take a decision. >> >> Which do you think is the most appropriate option for each one: >> >> trust: >> >> - HIGH >> - NORMAL >> - LOW >> >> visibility (keep in mind that we need this for FOAF!): >> >> - YES >> - NAME-ONLY >> - NO >> >> As identified at CTS4, it is *our* job to define the default value for >> that, because new users have no chance of understanding the >> implications of taking either choice. >> >> See bug #6151 for details: >> https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=6151 >> >> Best wishes, >> Arne >> _______________________________________________ >> Devl mailing list >> Devl@freenetproject.org >> https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl >> > > _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
