On 2014/04/10 (Apr), at 7:21 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Thoughts? Is it still worthwhile to do only-route-high-HTL-to-core-nodes > first...
I'm still trying to understand the full effect of this... to me, low-htl routing (deep/tail-end) is a more interesting (e.g. for performance & actually finding the data), but I can certainly appreciate wanting to shield ourselves from newbie nodes. > ... or do we need to go straight to tunnels? I've always been a fan of tunnels, or... "union routing done right" (as there are several ways to do it), but some part of me thinks we need to fix our current problems before we (potentially) layer on more. > And if we have tunnels, > do we still need only-route-high-HTL-to-core-nodes or would it be better > to rely solely on tunnels? At the face of it, I would presume it would be better to *avoid* establishing tunnels through new & untrusted nodes... unless all requests go through tunnels, in which case it's about as sensitive as the requests you would be protecting (high htl, inserts, etc). So it seems the ideas are related, as there is probably a better chance and danger of dropping into a Sybil network or MAST node if they are "new", right? -- Robert Hailey _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
