Am Freitag, 11. April 2014, 11:30:52 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > Doesn't answer the question - do we still need "route high htl requests > only to core nodes" if we have tunnels?
It still offers added security against MAST for anything which does not go through a tunnel - and since tunnels are expensive, there likely is stuff which should not be routed through a tunnel. And your argument that tunnels need to be stable supports the need for routing the initial steps through core-nodes. So I would think that yes. The interesting part of routing high-htl only to core-nodes is that if you want to attack the network, you actually need to support it. If the metric includes “returns good data to my requests”, this principle could make competing surveillance groups cancel out each others efforts as soon as we have tunnels (which if I understood them correctly would make it necessary to take over a bigger part of the core network to break anonymity). Best wishes, Arne -- Ein Würfel System - einfach saubere Regeln: - http://1w6.org _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
