On 06/11/2014 09:40 AM, xor wrote: > On Tuesday, June 03, 2014 08:46:57 PM Steve Dougherty wrote: >> On 06/03/2014 10:17 AM, Juiceman wrote: >>> On Jun 2, 2014 2:06 PM, "David Roden" <bo...@pterodactylus.net> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> you’re right. I pushed a fix to next. >>> >>> Thanks David! >>> >>> Steve, can we get a -testing release on this please? My build machine is >>> fubared right now. It is important that we get this tested and deployed >>> before the remaining seednodes get updated and opennet falls apart. >>> >>> Thanks. > >> It continues to be a problem that there are no seed node tests. > >> Snapshot release: > >> https://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/freenet-build01462-6-gaad73f6e603 >> edd87b6cc7f79640b3748ac7e3eed-snapshot.jar >> https://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/freenet-build01462-6-gaad73f6e60 >> 3edd87b6cc7f79640b3748ac7e3eed-snapshot.jar.sig > >> The CHKs are inserting now. > >> - Steve > > Uhm, didn't you deploy a new build yet? > Seeding being broken is BAD, this should be fixed ASAP!
I haven't deployed; I was hoping seed node operators would upgrade to it and save the trouble of the entire network upgrading. I don't know of a list of seed node operators. I'm not certain there's a drop in the estimated network size around that time; there may be. There's been a general downward trend for a while now. Do you think it'd make sense to cherry-pick, or to release next as it is?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
