On 06/11/2014 08:42 PM, Steve Dougherty wrote: > On 06/11/2014 09:40 AM, xor wrote: ... >> Uhm, didn't you deploy a new build yet? >> Seeding being broken is BAD, this should be fixed ASAP! > > I haven't deployed; I was hoping seed node operators would upgrade to it > and save the trouble of the entire network upgrading. I don't know of a > list of seed node operators. > > I'm not certain there's a drop in the estimated network size around that > time; there may be. There's been a general downward trend for a while now.
I wasn't able to bootstrap in 2 hours. Deploying it is. > Do you think it'd make sense to cherry-pick, or to release next as it is? I'm still not sure on this. The OOM handlers are removed in next. I grep'd my logs for the strings they log going back to Friday and found no occurrences. gzip complains some of the log archives are invalid, which I'm not sure what to make of. My system is not under heavy memory pressure, but I'm not sure the handlers are useful either.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
