On Sunday, November 08, 2015 04:34:11 PM Dan Roberts wrote: > It seems to me, our messaging was the most criticized aspect of the > website. Of all our messaging, the highest priority messaging should > be that seen in the "first 10 seconds" you're referring to. Since > someone on reddit compared us to Tor, and seeing as Tor is also a very > technical project that needs to explain itself to laypeople, perhaps > we could take some lessons from how they organize their messaging. > > https://www.torproject.org/ > > It's worth noting that Tor also primarily notes its features rather > than "what it is", which is something we received criticism for. > Though it does provide a non-technical description near the top: > > "Tor is free software and an open network that helps you defend > against traffic analysis, a form of network surveillance that > threatens personal freedom and privacy, confidential business > activities and relationships, and state security." > > Frankly, I'd argue we want to be even more concise than that, but I > think it's probably better than our first slider in the carousel. I > don't really think any of the carousel items is good enough as an > "elevator pitch", each one focuses on a particular feature, rather > than the whole. I think I'm going to open a couple of issues on github > around this (unless we're trying to keep website bugs in mantis?).
I haven't reviewed the said carousel, but I like your general ideas! Please keep all issues about Freenet projects in our main bugtracker [1], not on Github. This ensures that we can keep our intelligence even if Github goes bankrupt. I have recently set up an own subproject "Website" in the bugtracker, you can select it at top right. [1] https://bugs.freenetproject.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
