> It would be a fairly simple type system, and completly dynamic... you could
> probably get away with treating everything internally as a formatted string
> and error out when you get invalid syntax ("86400" as the hash for a CHK,
> etc...)
I mean, really, you're talking about putting a typed functional language
in our URIs.
Here's an idea. If you want an expandable way to specify parameters:
freenet:SSK at 2932032/blah?baseline=203102&interval=202020
Sure it's not nearly as pretty, but we could *at least* use the standard
syntax for specifying parameters.
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
