> > That syntax does work. Please explain why you think it doesn't. > > You can have: > > freenet:SSK at asdf/prefix > > Dude, how does this indicate a DBR?
If wouldn't indicate a DBR. I see what you're complaining about now, you want to be able to have a DBR and not specify either the baseline or the interval. Sorry that I didn't get that before. I don't see much use for that. I'm happy with having to specify at least one DBR-related field in order to specify that something is a DBR. However, if this is something that people really want, then I'm also happy with having a field which indicates that a URI is a dbr with default baseline and increment which can be used instead of specifying these values. So you can say freenet:SSK at asdf,dbr=yes/prefix//docname You might prefer this format freenet:SSK at asdf,dbr=prefix//docname, but other have seemed to prefer not putting the prefix in the parameters, and that seems sensible to me. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl >From - Tue Apr 17 01:42:06 2001 Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org> Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11]) by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA05110 for <danello at danky.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 17:04:35 -0400 Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611C8580FC; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 13:46:06 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: devl at freenetproject.org Received: from server5.generalmail.com (server5.fpw.ch [194.209.117.20]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A36357D97 for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 13:45:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([194.209.117.3]) by server5.generalmail.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5 release 215 ID# 0-58584U1100L100S0V35) with ESMTP id com for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 22:01:58 +0200
