Brandon <blanu at uts.cc.utexas.edu> writes:

> So, I suggest a format like this:
> 
> freenet:TLA at routingkey[,param[,param[,...]]]/prefix//docname
> 
> Each param is of the form key[=value]. If there is no value then it is
> assumed to be the cryptokey.
> 
> So, you get keys like this:
> freenet:SSK at asdf/blah//index.html (same as before)
> freenet:SSK at asdf,qwer/blah//index.html (same as before)
> freenet:SSK at asdf,qwer,baseline=1234/blah//index.html (DBR added)
> 
> It's both unambiguous and backwards-compatible.

Reply via email to