> Okay, I can agree to this, with one difference: the actual key=value > syntax used to specify a DBR. The thing is is that the DBR is a formula > for generating the docname -- the "blah" in the above examples. So > if you separate them you have to define a formula for the final string.
I see no usefulness in being able to arbitrarily place the date portion of the key anywhere in the string. The purpose of the date portion is to allow for date-based versioning of keys. This is achieved fully by putting the date on the end. Being able to place the date arbitrarily is flexibility that complicates things without serving any actual purpose. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl >From - Tue Apr 17 01:41:38 2001 Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org> Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11]) by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA04602 for <danello at danky.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 15:29:44 -0400 Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
