On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 02:04:13PM +1200, David McNab wrote: > From: "Ian Clarke" <ian at hawk.freenetproject.org> > >It is, however, important for us to get over the idea that Freenet needs > >to look and behave like mp3 sharing tools such as the Gnutella clients, > >and others. > > What do you mean? > Are you saying that Freenet shouldn't rank with most Windows applications > for user-friendliness? No, what Ian was getting at is that a Gnutella/Napster style Search with Result list isn't adaptable to Freenet.
> >but it is not really appropriate for > >our goals of freedom of information. > > What??!??! > User-friendliness is "not really appropriate for our goals of freedom of > information" ??!? Of course user friendliness is. Being exactly like Joe-Poorly-Designed-Filesharing-Network isn't. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010925/0e38f12d/attachment.pgp>
