On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 02:04:13PM +1200, David McNab wrote: > Are you saying that Freenet shouldn't rank with most Windows applications > for user-friendliness?
Obviously not. I am saying that Freenet is not an mp3 sharing tool, so our goal should not be to make it look like one. I am *not* saying that we shouldn't try to make Freenet as user friendly as possible, merely that user friendliness does not equate to looking like Napster. > What??!??! > User-friendliness is "not really appropriate for our goals of freedom of > information" ??!? That is not what I said, and clearly - if you consider anything I have said on the issue of user friendliness from day one - not what I think. Ian. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010926/3910e73c/attachment.pgp>
