On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:25:32AM -0500, Tavin Cole wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 04:05:31PM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote: < > > > Umm, does anybody read either? > > I think that GJ has been trying to keep up with the SF one recently. > Adam's FNBTS needed a little work but was far superior to SF's imho > (particularly with the IRC interface, and the nice command language).
I have tried to look at the FS tracker from time to time, but I never found a single meaningfull bug in there - only people who were doing something wrong and installer problems. > What we ought to do is integrate Adam's FNBTS into the > freenetproject.org site and disable the SF tracker. As long as people are quick to filter out the irrelevant (or should I say seperately relevant) stuff. > > It will be faster and easier to fix our own logger than to add a bunch > > of jakarta bloat. I don't know if having a system to only print specific > > log statements is really necessary - I suppose what people really need > > are more levels to choose from. > > The log-levels aren't really that useful (NORMAL and ERROR would > probably suffice).. usually one wants to filter by Class. Well, that is already possible with the current system. No major change there. I think the levels are good if somewhat mislabeled. Remaning ERROR -> CRITICAL NORMAL -> IMPORTANT MINOR -> RELEVANT DEBUG -> TYPICAL so they clearly mark the importance of the statement would probably help us use them correctly. > > Also, there are a lot of redundant log statements that should probably > > go away completely as soon as things work half decently. > > I have been cutting down the DEBUG output and removed the stack-traces for > connection/auth failures. I think what is important is that log statements never occur within internal loops. <> -- Oskar Sandberg oskar at freenetproject.org _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
