On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 05:12:37PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote: > On Monday 14 January 2002 15:31, Oskar wrote: < > > > BFD. So the interface is not perfect and the client behavior isn't > > always intuitive. I knew that already, and I have never claimed that > > Fred is perfect or finished. > > I apologize if my tone was not constructive. It seems like this might be > very easy to fix. I looked at it for ten minutes a while ago and didn't > immediately see how. I was hoping you might do the same.
IIRC, when I wrote that stuff I decided it was not possible to code the arbitrary behavior of allowing fail inserts on CHK but not others in a general manner, so I simply left it out of the general framework to be added as an exception somewhere. <> > > We were discussing whether the bugs on sf were relevant, > The point I was trying to make is that the bug reports can be a useful > repository for information about known problems. Relying on personal memory > and list archives doesn't work that well. You can't expect potential new > developers to read a gigabyte of mailing list archives to know what the open > issues in the codebase are. Many important issues are raised discussed > debated, fought over and then forgotten without ever being resolved. This is solved completely by just using a todo file in cvs. We kept such a file this summer: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/freenet/docs/todo04.txt but it has not been updated since. -- Oskar Sandberg oskar at freenetproject.org _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
