> Well, I have never heard or read that Toad said that, but the response > to anyone that did say that is that the darknet is there so that it is > available to those that need it. If people don't need the security > offered by participating in a darknet, then they should use the opennet.
But that is a silly argument. Why have FProxy filtering content. If people want security they can just view sites in plain text, can't they. But currently you aren't even warning people asking them what do they want to do with external links, but simply remove them. The reason for that is that when people ask somebody like me what to use for their anonymity on the internet, i tell them about freenet, with the opennet i will have to mention that they should make sure to go for darknet if they want to be truly anonymous. If you are approaching this from perspective "but people want it" then a lot of people want blocks to be marked by the extension of the file, so that they can say "i only want MP3 in my datastore" are you planning to implement this? Then why are you still going for the opennet? -- Hi! I am a .SIG virus! Copy me to your SIG so that I can spread! http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast http://www.whengendarmesleeps.org/ When Gendarme Sleeps, Anarchy's Zine of Poetry ======================== "None of us are free until all of us are free." ~ Mihail Bakunin
