>> The reason for that is that when people ask somebody like me what to
>> use for their anonymity on the internet, i tell them about freenet,
>> with the opennet i will have to mention that they should make sure to
>> go for darknet if they want to be truly anonymous.
>
> And what is wrong with that?
>
>> If you are approaching this from perspective "but people want it" then
>> a lot of people want blocks to be marked by the extension of the file,
>> so that they can say "i only want MP3 in my datastore" are you
>> planning to implement this? Then why are you still going for the opennet?
>
> Now this really is a silly argument. We don't make it easy for people
> to filter their datastores because it would hurt Freenet, but allowing
> people to be part of an opennet, having made an informed decision to do
> so, doesn't hurt Freenet, it helps the network by allowing more peers
> and a richer link density.
>
> Ian.
Ok, i give up. I still think that you are going to suck darknet dry the day you
release
opennet. But it's not my project.
- Volodya
--
Hi! I am a .SIG virus! Copy me to your SIG so that I can spread!
http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast
http://www.whengendarmesleeps.org/ When Gendarme Sleeps, Anarchy's Zine of
Poetry
========================
"None of us are free until all of us are free."
~ Mihail Bakunin
