On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 09:44:37AM +0100, Volodya wrote: > >Well, I have never heard or read that Toad said that, but the response > >to anyone that did say that is that the darknet is there so that it is > >available to those that need it. If people don't need the security > >offered by participating in a darknet, then they should use the opennet. > > But that is a silly argument. Why have FProxy filtering content. If people > want security they can just view sites in plain text, can't they. But > currently you aren't even warning people asking them what do they want to > do with external links, but simply remove them.
That's a bug. It will be fixed eventually. How important is it to you? > The reason for that is that > when people ask somebody like me what to use for their anonymity on the > internet, i tell them about freenet, with the opennet i will have to > mention that they should make sure to go for darknet if they want to be > truly anonymous. > > If you are approaching this from perspective "but people want it" then a > lot of people want blocks to be marked by the extension of the file, so > that they can say "i only want MP3 in my datastore" are you planning to > implement this? Then why are you still going for the opennet? -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20060628/fdb62e91/attachment.pgp>
