Thank you for serving the Freenet Project in this way! That would mean that there are very few child porn sites on 0.7 - is it all on frost, or are indexes self-censoring? (No, don't post links!).
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 08:01:09PM -0400, Juiceman wrote: > GASP kp. If you had checked it, you would see it was adults in some > light bondage gear aka kinky porn. > > On 10/3/06, toad <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > >We should add some more index sites. > >Currently we only have the Darknet Index: > >USK at > >PFeLTa1si2Ml5sDeUy7eDhPso6TPdmw-2gWfQ4Jg02w,3ocfrqgUMVWA2PeorZx40TW0c-FiIOL-TWKQHoDbVdE,AQABAAE/Index/40/index.html > > > >The problem with this is it hasn't been updated in ages. > > > >There is the public index (which is always up to date, it seems), but > >IMHO it would be unwise to link to something which is globally writable; > >somebody may replace it with a redirect to the goat man, or worse, in the > >middle of us being /.ed or doing a major release. > >USK at > >60I8H8HinpgZSOuTSD66AVlIFAy-xsppFr0YCzCar7c,NzdivUGCGOdlgngOGRbbKDNfSCnjI0FXjHLzJM4xkJ4,AQABAAE/index/83/ > > > >Then there is Indicia. This has activelinks, but offensive activelinks > >are censored. It has descriptions for every site, although some of them > >are ambiguous, and it is categorised. And it's updated regularly. A first > >time user browsing Indicia will only run into porn if they want it, and > >as far as I can see there is no outrageous child porn at the moment, and > >even if there was it would almost certainly be labelled properly. > > > >USK at > >c55vMxUl-T-lD3nv0iOaXF%7eG1hnY6pOMRbzZSwACMmY%2cyd8%7euwUmGm164-ipStoiBOJVjkbbYXJMlD%7eH5ftPxIA%2cAQABAAE/Indicia/31/ > > > >And there is Another Index. This is uncensored, no pictures, with no > >manual descriptions, although it may be manually categorised. The > >problem is that on the Porn section it links to a site called "kp", > >without explaining the (sadly well-known amongst freenet users) acronym. > > > >USK at > >e4TEIN5l1nkn6kjl63XBgYTYobmwGvtnyK2YW0b0ajo,hv-2~OfetXkb0FhDuPxorWIf0wXeZKPEfdIhwyh-mhk,AQABAAE/AnotherIndex/27/ > > > >Which of these should we put on our homepage? Ian has stated that our > >policy must be to link to those indexes which will best help users to > >find content, without prejudice to the nature of that content. Indicia > >scores very high on this count, by virtue of having descriptions. IMHO > >another, related requirement we should impose is that newbies won't run > >into child porn without being warned about it at some stage. > > > >So should we include AnotherIndex, or not? If we do, should we include a > >warning that it doesn't provide descriptions and there may be > >objectionable content? If we're going to put warnings on, should we > >include the Public Index as well? > > > > > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > >Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) > > > >iD8DBQFFIoHdA9rUluQ9pFARAv5bAJwONWYpvYDFr1FPdjoCdz9IbETN0ACghtld > >Lq/0OdGdzXlO9fE7oCQooaw= > >=OND7 > >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Devl mailing list > >Devl at freenetproject.org > >http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > > > > > > > -- > I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the > death, your right to say it. - Voltaire > Those who would give up Liberty, to purchase temporary Safety, deserve > neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20061004/008a4624/attachment.pgp>
