With no description and only two letters it could be anything, assuming kp
stands for kiddy porn says what about you?

On 10/3/06, Ian Clarke <ian at locut.us> wrote:
>
> Why would he want to risk breaking the law by viewing a website where the
> name of that site indicates that it is child pornography?
>
> Ian.
>
> On 3 Oct 2006, at 17:01, Juiceman wrote:
>
> GASP kp.  If you had checked it, you would see it was adults in some
> light bondage gear aka kinky porn.
>
> On 10/3/06, toad <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote:
>
> We should add some more index sites.
> Currently we only have the Darknet Index:
> USK at PFeLTa1si2Ml5sDeUy7eDhPso6TPdmw-2gWfQ4Jg02w
> ,3ocfrqgUMVWA2PeorZx40TW0c-FiIOL-TWKQHoDbVdE,AQABAAE/Index/40/index.html
>
> The problem with this is it hasn't been updated in ages.
>
> There is the public index (which is always up to date, it seems), but
> IMHO it would be unwise to link to something which is globally writable;
> somebody may replace it with a redirect to the goat man, or worse, in the
> middle of us being /.ed or doing a major release.
> USK at 60I8H8HinpgZSOuTSD66AVlIFAy-xsppFr0YCzCar7c
> ,NzdivUGCGOdlgngOGRbbKDNfSCnjI0FXjHLzJM4xkJ4,AQABAAE/index/83/
>
> Then there is Indicia. This has activelinks, but offensive activelinks
> are censored. It has descriptions for every site, although some of them
> are ambiguous, and it is categorised. And it's updated regularly. A first
> time user browsing Indicia will only run into porn if they want it, and
> as far as I can see there is no outrageous child porn at the moment, and
> even if there was it would almost certainly be labelled properly.
>
> USK at c55vMxUl-T-lD3nv0iOaXF
> %7eG1hnY6pOMRbzZSwACMmY%2cyd8%7euwUmGm164-ipStoiBOJVjkbbYXJMlD%7eH5ftPxIA%2cAQABAAE/Indicia/31/
>
> And there is Another Index. This is uncensored, no pictures, with no
> manual descriptions, although it may be manually categorised. The
> problem is that on the Porn section it links to a site called "kp",
> without explaining the (sadly well-known amongst freenet users) acronym.
>
> USK at e4TEIN5l1nkn6kjl63XBgYTYobmwGvtnyK2YW0b0ajo
> ,hv-2~OfetXkb0FhDuPxorWIf0wXeZKPEfdIhwyh-mhk,AQABAAE/AnotherIndex/27/
>
> Which of these should we put on our homepage? Ian has stated that our
> policy must be to link to those indexes which will best help users to
> find content, without prejudice to the nature of that content. Indicia
> scores very high on this count, by virtue of having descriptions. IMHO
> another, related requirement we should impose is that newbies won't run
> into child porn without being warned about it at some stage.
>
> So should we include AnotherIndex, or not? If we do, should we include a
> warning that it doesn't provide descriptions and there may be
> objectionable content? If we're going to put warnings on, should we
> include the Public Index as well?
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFFIoHdA9rUluQ9pFARAv5bAJwONWYpvYDFr1FPdjoCdz9IbETN0ACghtld
> Lq/0OdGdzXlO9fE7oCQooaw=
> =OND7
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devl mailing list
> Devl at freenetproject.org
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>
>
>
>
> --
> I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the
> death, your right to say it. - Voltaire
> Those who would give up Liberty, to purchase temporary Safety, deserve
> neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin
> _______________________________________________
> Devl mailing list
> Devl at freenetproject.org
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>
>
>  *Ian Clarke*: Co-Founder & Chief Scientist Revver, Inc.<http://revver.com>
> phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http://locut.us/blog
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devl mailing list
> Devl at freenetproject.org
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>
>


-- 
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death,
your right to say it. - Voltaire
Those who would give up Liberty, to purchase temporary Safety, deserve
neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20061004/b29818f7/attachment.html>

Reply via email to