Heh. The point is, the most useful index is one with detailed and preferably third party (or third party reviewed) descriptions.
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 08:37:45AM +0100, Volodya wrote: > > With no description and only two letters it could be anything, assuming > > kp stands for kiddy porn says what about you? > > Well played. > > Unfortunately "the elite of Freenet" has been fighting against "Freenet is > Pedonet" > point-of-view for so long that they themselves started believing that. > "Anti-thesis > becomes a thesis". > > - Volodya > > P.S. To make sure that it's not only a "destructive" criticism, but to offer > an > alternative: It's possible to view content on freenet as "Wide range of > topics, some of > which may be child pornography" rather than "Child pornography as well as > wide range of > other topics". > > -- > http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast > http://freeselfdefence.info/ Self-defence wiki > > "None of us are free until all of us are free." > ~ Mihail Bakunin > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20061004/afde2f27/attachment.pgp>
