Why would he want to risk breaking the law by viewing a website where the name of that site indicates that it is child pornography?
Ian. On 3 Oct 2006, at 17:01, Juiceman wrote: > GASP kp. If you had checked it, you would see it was adults in some > light bondage gear aka kinky porn. > > On 10/3/06, toad <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: >> We should add some more index sites. >> Currently we only have the Darknet Index: >> USK at PFeLTa1si2Ml5sDeUy7eDhPso6TPdmw-2gWfQ4Jg02w, >> 3ocfrqgUMVWA2PeorZx40TW0c-FiIOL-TWKQHoDbVdE,AQABAAE/Index/40/ >> index.html >> >> The problem with this is it hasn't been updated in ages. >> >> There is the public index (which is always up to date, it seems), but >> IMHO it would be unwise to link to something which is globally >> writable; >> somebody may replace it with a redirect to the goat man, or worse, >> in the >> middle of us being /.ed or doing a major release. >> USK at 60I8H8HinpgZSOuTSD66AVlIFAy- >> xsppFr0YCzCar7c,NzdivUGCGOdlgngOGRbbKDNfSCnjI0FXjHLzJM4xkJ4,AQABAAE/i >> ndex/83/ >> >> Then there is Indicia. This has activelinks, but offensive >> activelinks >> are censored. It has descriptions for every site, although some of >> them >> are ambiguous, and it is categorised. And it's updated regularly. >> A first >> time user browsing Indicia will only run into porn if they want >> it, and >> as far as I can see there is no outrageous child porn at the >> moment, and >> even if there was it would almost certainly be labelled properly. >> >> USK at c55vMxUl-T-lD3nv0iOaXF%7eG1hnY6pOMRbzZSwACMmY%2cyd8% >> 7euwUmGm164-ipStoiBOJVjkbbYXJMlD%7eH5ftPxIA%2cAQABAAE/Indicia/31/ >> >> And there is Another Index. This is uncensored, no pictures, with no >> manual descriptions, although it may be manually categorised. The >> problem is that on the Porn section it links to a site called "kp", >> without explaining the (sadly well-known amongst freenet users) >> acronym. >> >> USK at e4TEIN5l1nkn6kjl63XBgYTYobmwGvtnyK2YW0b0ajo,hv-2~OfetXkb0FhDuPxor >> WIf0wXeZKPEfdIhwyh-mhk,AQABAAE/AnotherIndex/27/ >> >> Which of these should we put on our homepage? Ian has stated that our >> policy must be to link to those indexes which will best help users to >> find content, without prejudice to the nature of that content. >> Indicia >> scores very high on this count, by virtue of having descriptions. >> IMHO >> another, related requirement we should impose is that newbies >> won't run >> into child porn without being warned about it at some stage. >> >> So should we include AnotherIndex, or not? If we do, should we >> include a >> warning that it doesn't provide descriptions and there may be >> objectionable content? If we're going to put warnings on, should we >> include the Public Index as well? >> >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) >> >> iD8DBQFFIoHdA9rUluQ9pFARAv5bAJwONWYpvYDFr1FPdjoCdz9IbETN0ACghtld >> Lq/0OdGdzXlO9fE7oCQooaw= >> =OND7 >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Devl mailing list >> Devl at freenetproject.org >> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl >> >> > > > -- > I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the > death, your right to say it. - Voltaire > Those who would give up Liberty, to purchase temporary Safety, deserve > neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > Ian Clarke: Co-Founder & Chief Scientist Revver, Inc. phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http://locut.us/blog -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20061003/a2ca1687/attachment.html>
