On 2/4/07, Jerome Flesch <jflesch at nerim.net> wrote:
> > If FCP2 want to provide clients an easy access, then the following
> > changes are needed:
> >
> > Answer to a ModifyPersistentRequest should not be a new
> > Persistent<blah> with all values, but a ModifiedPersistentRequest
> > message with only the changed values. Otherwise the client has to do
> > all syncing and searching for really changed values.
> >
> > Answer to a RemovePersistentRequest should be a
> > RemovedPersistentRequest, this is a clear answer to the request and
> > clients don't need to do much investigation here.
> >
> Does that mean you will remove the GetFailed message ?
> Don't forget that currently, this message is broadcasted to all the
> FCP clients with WatchGlobal set to 1 (Thaw, for example).
>
Of course GetFailed will not be removed, but it would not be sent on a
RemovePersistentRequest. And it was never sent before after a
RemovePersistentRequest (was not implemented in node), so nothing
would change.
>
> > Its easy to implement this in the node and I offer to do the changes
> > and to document them in the wiki. Existing clients are not affected.
> >
> > Please discuss this, and with your answer provide an explanation WHY
> > you recommendation is better then the given ones, thanks.
> >
> > rgds, bback.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Devl mailing list
> > Devl at freenetproject.org
> > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Devl mailing list
> Devl at freenetproject.org
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>
