2007/2/4, bbackde at googlemail.com <bbackde at googlemail.com>: > On 2/4/07, Jerome Flesch <jflesch at nerim.net> wrote: > > > If FCP2 want to provide clients an easy access, then the following > > > changes are needed: > > > > > > Answer to a ModifyPersistentRequest should not be a new > > > Persistent<blah> with all values, but a ModifiedPersistentRequest > > > message with only the changed values. Otherwise the client has to do > > > all syncing and searching for really changed values. > > > > > > Answer to a RemovePersistentRequest should be a > > > RemovedPersistentRequest, this is a clear answer to the request and > > > clients don't need to do much investigation here. > > > > > Does that mean you will remove the GetFailed message ? > > Don't forget that currently, this message is broadcasted to all the > > FCP clients with WatchGlobal set to 1 (Thaw, for example). > > > Of course GetFailed will not be removed, but it would not be sent on a > RemovePersistentRequest. And it was never sent before after a > RemovePersistentRequest (was not implemented in node), so nothing > would change. > Then, that's ok for me.
> > > > > Its easy to implement this in the node and I offer to do the changes > > > and to document them in the wiki. Existing clients are not affected. > > > > > > Please discuss this, and with your answer provide an explanation WHY > > > you recommendation is better then the given ones, thanks. > > > > > > rgds, bback. > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Devl mailing list > > > Devl at freenetproject.org > > > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Devl mailing list > > Devl at freenetproject.org > > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl >
