On 12/01/10 18:40, VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote: > But if it's not open for writes it will be either centralised or censorable > (or > both). Thus KSK based system is really the only way to do this.
"open for writes" is "censorable" too. why do you make a distinction between actively removing a piece of content, and flooding billions of random files which makes the content hard to find? the end result is the same - it's no longer easily available to the people that want to access it. hiding (ie. censorship) is not a bad thing in itself, it's the form this takes that matters. freenet tries to be resistance against a corrupt central censor, KSKs are open to random small-time censors that can inflict large amounts of chaos, as proved by frost. X > > And yes it will be possible to attack some domain and make it forward to a > different key, especially if it's not popular enough. > > - Volodya >
