On 12/01/10 19:16, VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote: > Basically a KSK can hold any data, in this particular case we are talking > about > a redirect to a USK. So let's say i want to have a domain iamcool.freenet, > then > (for example) i would insert my freesite, and then insert KSK at > iamcool.freenet to > redirect to the key for my freesite. I will care less if somebody is > 'flooding > billions of random files' into other keys, because once i will insert my key > chances are it will be found by somebody. Of course there is a chance that > somebody will run a dictionary attack and try to 'register' all possible word > combinations of domain names, but then people will just have to find the > domain > that isn't taken... just like they would in the DNS in the www.
I know how KSKs work, but the principle is the same. Someone can repeatedly insert the same KSK and make different nodes store different things. A government could easily do it, for example. "You can always use an SSK" is not an argument if 90% of the links on freenet point to KSKs. There is definitely potential for a name-resolution service otherwise. X
