Ximin Luo ?????:
> On 12/01/10 19:16, VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote:
>> Basically a KSK can hold any data, in this particular case we are talking
>> about
>> a redirect to a USK. So let's say i want to have a domain iamcool.freenet,
>> then
>> (for example) i would insert my freesite, and then insert KSK at
>> iamcool.freenet to
>> redirect to the key for my freesite. I will care less if somebody is
>> 'flooding
>> billions of random files' into other keys, because once i will insert my key
>> chances are it will be found by somebody. Of course there is a chance that
>> somebody will run a dictionary attack and try to 'register' all possible
>> word
>> combinations of domain names, but then people will just have to find the
>> domain
>> that isn't taken... just like they would in the DNS in the www.
>
> I know how KSKs work, but the principle is the same. Someone can repeatedly
> insert the same KSK and make different nodes store different things. A
> government could easily do it, for example. "You can always use an SSK" is not
> an argument if 90% of the links on freenet point to KSKs. There is definitely
> potential for a name-resolution service otherwise.
>
> X
Please propose a *decentralised* solution without reinventing KSK by using
other
key types.
- Volodya
--
http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Echo of Freedom, Radical Podcast
http://www.freedomporn.org/ Freedom Porn, anarchist and activist smut
"None of us are free until all of us are free." ~ Mihail Bakunin
