+0 provided that there is an order in the codenames set and the mapping function between the version numbers and the codenames is monotonic wrt to this order. Preferably, the order is not defined as the set is defined ;), but it's a well known, a priori chosen relation, such as the lexicographical order.
Thanks, Anca On 08/11/2010 06:17 PM, Jerome Velociter wrote: > Hello friends, > > I would like to propose introducing the use of code names for each release > cycle of XWiki (2.x, 3.x, etc.), using a agreed-on scheme (a la Ubuntu [1]). > The main reason behind this proposal is that : > > A. it's groovy :) > B. there is no B. > > As for the code name scheme, with regard to recent events involving a fair > portion of the XWiki Development team [2], I would like to propose the use of > cocktail names as code names. Some examples - for the sake of illustration : > XWiki "Cuba Libre" 2.5, XWiki "White Russian" 2.6, XWiki "Bloody Mary" 3.0, > etc. you name it! [3]. Virgin cocktails tolerated :) > > The release manager for each cycle would have the honor to pick up the > release code name. Isn't that an awesome incentive ? > > +1 for all that > > Jerome. > > [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DevelopmentCodeNames > [2] http://www.xwiki.com/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/XWiki+Seminar'10 > [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cocktails > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
