+1 for names (but as subtitle of the number) +0 for cocktail names As for the choice, IMO if should be part of the branch roadmap process since the name is for the branch and not for each release.
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 17:17, Jerome Velociter <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello friends, > > I would like to propose introducing the use of code names for each release > cycle of XWiki (2.x, 3.x, etc.), using a agreed-on scheme (a la Ubuntu [1]). > The main reason behind this proposal is that : > > A. it's groovy :) > B. there is no B. > > As for the code name scheme, with regard to recent events involving a fair > portion of the XWiki Development team [2], I would like to propose the use of > cocktail names as code names. Some examples - for the sake of illustration : > XWiki "Cuba Libre" 2.5, XWiki "White Russian" 2.6, XWiki "Bloody Mary" 3.0, > etc. you name it! [3]. Virgin cocktails tolerated :) > > The release manager for each cycle would have the honor to pick up the > release code name. Isn't that an awesome incentive ? > > +1 for all that > > Jerome. > > [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DevelopmentCodeNames > [2] http://www.xwiki.com/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/XWiki+Seminar'10 > [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cocktails > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
