On 08/11/2010 06:44 PM, Alex Busenius wrote: > Code names may be a funny addition, but please please don't completely > replace the normal, universally understandable, mutually comparable > numbers with some random strings that nobody can remember. > > +0
+0 for the idea, with the same mention: the code name should be secondary, leaving the number as the main identifier. I'd also like something else, not cocktail names. > > > On 08/11/2010 05:17 PM, Jerome Velociter wrote: >> Hello friends, >> >> I would like to propose introducing the use of code names for each release >> cycle of XWiki (2.x, 3.x, etc.), using a agreed-on scheme (a la Ubuntu [1]). >> The main reason behind this proposal is that : >> >> A. it's groovy :) >> B. there is no B. >> >> As for the code name scheme, with regard to recent events involving a fair >> portion of the XWiki Development team [2], I would like to propose the use >> of cocktail names as code names. Some examples - for the sake of >> illustration : XWiki "Cuba Libre" 2.5, XWiki "White Russian" 2.6, XWiki >> "Bloody Mary" 3.0, etc. you name it! [3]. Virgin cocktails tolerated :) >> >> The release manager for each cycle would have the honor to pick up the >> release code name. Isn't that an awesome incentive ? >> >> +1 for all that -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
