+1 as long as it's marked experimental. For the future, when the syntax is stable, what migration path do we offer ? An option to automatically migrate all 2.0 content to 2.1 ?
Also when changing syntax in the panel, should we provide specific migrators to migrate a page from 1.0 directly to 2.1 like we do from 2.0 to 2.1 ? from 2.0 to 2.1 ? (this one probably is not needed) Jerome. On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to include xwiki/2.1 in the list of available syntaxes by default > for 2.6RC1. > > Of course the default syntax remains xwiki/2.0. > > The rationale is: > * Get people to know it exist and try it out as early as possible to provide > feedback > > Note that it's marked (experimental) in the syntax combo box list so it > should be enough to let people know about its status. > > Here's my +1 > > WDYT? > > Thanks > -Vincent > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
