+1 On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 15:58, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Nov 2, 2010, at 1:39 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: > > > +1 provided that it's shown in the syntax display name that this is > > still in an experimental state. > > It's already displayed like this thomas. > > Thanks > -Vincent > > > > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:10, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'd like to include xwiki/2.1 in the list of available syntaxes by > default for 2.6RC1. > >> > >> Of course the default syntax remains xwiki/2.0. > >> > >> The rationale is: > >> * Get people to know it exist and try it out as early as possible to > provide feedback > >> > >> Note that it's marked (experimental) in the syntax combo box list so it > should be enough to let people know about its status. > >> > >> Here's my +1 > >> > >> WDYT? > >> > >> Thanks > >> -Vincent > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
